<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Paul M. Dubuc</title>
	<link>http://paul.dubuc.org</link>
	<description>Welcome friends, family and other interested persons!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 07:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Coming Home To Your True Self, by Albert Hasse, O.F.M. by David Henne</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2011/10/22/coming-home-to-your-true-self-by-albert-hasse-ofm/#comment-12463</link>
		<author>David Henne</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 03:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2011/10/22/coming-home-to-your-true-self-by-albert-hasse-ofm/#comment-12463</guid>
		<description>Hi, Paul. The statement that impressed me most is that our experience with God is the main thing to "get," and that this consists of life right now. I do spend time and energy thinking of the past and the future, not in ways that teach me and prepare me, but only hashing over or day-dreaming, which are not helpful. Always relating to God's life in me now would help me distinguish the sometimes fine line between profitable and futile ways of dealing with past and future.  David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Paul. The statement that impressed me most is that our experience with God is the main thing to &#8220;get,&#8221; and that this consists of life right now. I do spend time and energy thinking of the past and the future, not in ways that teach me and prepare me, but only hashing over or day-dreaming, which are not helpful. Always relating to God&#8217;s life in me now would help me distinguish the sometimes fine line between profitable and futile ways of dealing with past and future.  David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;All Truth is God&#8217;s Truth&#8221; by Paul Dubuc</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2011/04/17/all-truth-is-gods-truth/#comment-12375</link>
		<author>Paul Dubuc</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2011/04/17/all-truth-is-gods-truth/#comment-12375</guid>
		<description>Arthur Holmes died on October 8th:  http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctliveblog/archives/2011/10/arthur_holmes_a.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur Holmes died on October 8th:  <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctliveblog/archives/2011/10/arthur_holmes_a.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctliveblog/archives/2011/10/arthur_holmes_a.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Walk On, by John Goldingay by Jason Button</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2007/08/05/walk-on-by-john-goldingay/#comment-9007</link>
		<author>Jason Button</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 14:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2007/08/05/walk-on-by-john-goldingay/#comment-9007</guid>
		<description>I agree. This was an excellent read and very much like sitting down with a friend!  Thanks for sharing your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. This was an excellent read and very much like sitting down with a friend!  Thanks for sharing your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;All Truth is God&#8217;s Truth&#8221; by David Henne</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2011/04/17/all-truth-is-gods-truth/#comment-8892</link>
		<author>David Henne</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2011/04/17/all-truth-is-gods-truth/#comment-8892</guid>
		<description>Paul -- Yes, I think one example is the other religions of the world. They are attempts by humans to come up with some way to remedy our deficiency for getting in contect with God. All of them that I have come in contact with contain some point or points that seem to have come through from God's self-revelation to the people of the world, but that didn't come all the way through to realize how Christ fit into the whole historical development to fulfill the needed contact. It seems our missionary challenge is to fill in the gap. -- David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul &#8212; Yes, I think one example is the other religions of the world. They are attempts by humans to come up with some way to remedy our deficiency for getting in contect with God. All of them that I have come in contact with contain some point or points that seem to have come through from God&#8217;s self-revelation to the people of the world, but that didn&#8217;t come all the way through to realize how Christ fit into the whole historical development to fulfill the needed contact. It seems our missionary challenge is to fill in the gap. &#8212; David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thank You, Bill Pearce by David Henne</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2011/02/23/thank-you-bill-pearce/#comment-8667</link>
		<author>David Henne</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 23:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2011/02/23/thank-you-bill-pearce/#comment-8667</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Paul, for sharaing with your readers about someone who had such a salutory effect on your life and helped you know Jesus. It's really important to recognize people like this in our lives, and it encourages us to be like that to those we interact with, even though we're not diffusing our words and actions to a wide media audience. --- David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Paul, for sharaing with your readers about someone who had such a salutory effect on your life and helped you know Jesus. It&#8217;s really important to recognize people like this in our lives, and it encourages us to be like that to those we interact with, even though we&#8217;re not diffusing our words and actions to a wide media audience. &#8212; David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deep Church: A Third Way Beyond Emerging and Traditional, by Jim Belcher by Ben Simpson</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/07/25/deep-church-a-third-way-beyond-emerging-and-traditional-by-jim-belcher/#comment-5254</link>
		<author>Ben Simpson</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/07/25/deep-church-a-third-way-beyond-emerging-and-traditional-by-jim-belcher/#comment-5254</guid>
		<description>Paul:

I know I'm late to the party, but thanks for the link.  Deep Church was a critical read for me, in that it helped me better articulate my understandings of what the "emerging church" might be, as well as provide some of the tools needed to critique some of the theological strains present in that conversation/movement/community.

Blessings to you and yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul:</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m late to the party, but thanks for the link.  Deep Church was a critical read for me, in that it helped me better articulate my understandings of what the &#8220;emerging church&#8221; might be, as well as provide some of the tools needed to critique some of the theological strains present in that conversation/movement/community.</p>
<p>Blessings to you and yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Hear and See Jesus by David Henne</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/06/12/to-hear-and-see-jesus/#comment-5229</link>
		<author>David Henne</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/06/12/to-hear-and-see-jesus/#comment-5229</guid>
		<description>Hi, Paul.  This article touches on a subject that I am very short on. I have never developed, or even longed for, a desire to see Jesus. I know and say that he is the one who has saved me from death and given me life. Why don't I desire strongly to see him and be with him? I think I feel that I enjoy all of his blessings so much that I consider them as being he himself. It seems I haven't got to the point yet that I consider him as of more value than all that he gives me. It's like Reynolds' line: "Heaven will stop being about me at all, but about Him." Will I get to that point before being in Heaven?  David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Paul.  This article touches on a subject that I am very short on. I have never developed, or even longed for, a desire to see Jesus. I know and say that he is the one who has saved me from death and given me life. Why don&#8217;t I desire strongly to see him and be with him? I think I feel that I enjoy all of his blessings so much that I consider them as being he himself. It seems I haven&#8217;t got to the point yet that I consider him as of more value than all that he gives me. It&#8217;s like Reynolds&#8217; line: &#8220;Heaven will stop being about me at all, but about Him.&#8221; Will I get to that point before being in Heaven?  David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deep Church: A Third Way Beyond Emerging and Traditional, by Jim Belcher by Paul Dubuc</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/07/25/deep-church-a-third-way-beyond-emerging-and-traditional-by-jim-belcher/#comment-5227</link>
		<author>Paul Dubuc</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/07/25/deep-church-a-third-way-beyond-emerging-and-traditional-by-jim-belcher/#comment-5227</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

Thanks for your comments.  I think your observations are pretty accurate.  The thing I like about Belcher's book is that he seems to understand this process and is trying to get the greatest benefit from it that he can without "taking sides" and contributing to the animosity generated by the conflict.  His is a sensitive, thoughtful and potentially healing approach, I think.

By the way, the term "deep church" is borrowed from C. S. Lewis.  It was another term he used for what he called "mere Christianity."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.  I think your observations are pretty accurate.  The thing I like about Belcher&#8217;s book is that he seems to understand this process and is trying to get the greatest benefit from it that he can without &#8220;taking sides&#8221; and contributing to the animosity generated by the conflict.  His is a sensitive, thoughtful and potentially healing approach, I think.</p>
<p>By the way, the term &#8220;deep church&#8221; is borrowed from C. S. Lewis.  It was another term he used for what he called &#8220;mere Christianity.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deep Church: A Third Way Beyond Emerging and Traditional, by Jim Belcher by David Henne</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/07/25/deep-church-a-third-way-beyond-emerging-and-traditional-by-jim-belcher/#comment-5226</link>
		<author>David Henne</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/07/25/deep-church-a-third-way-beyond-emerging-and-traditional-by-jim-belcher/#comment-5226</guid>
		<description>Hi, Paul.  My view of the emergent church is that the church has been emerging for 2000 years. The next generation is always emerging from the previous one in all walks of life. Our predecessors leave us imperfect ways of dealing with life, we see the errors of emphasizing one thing or another to the detriment of other things they have overlooked, we vow to correct their imbalances, then we leave our own to the next generation. In the process we put labels on what we have been left--favorable ones (such as "evangelical") if we like it and unfavorable ones (such as "rational") if we don't--and dream up fresh ones for the brilliant solutions we offer (such as "deep"). And so goes history, until the Messiah reigns.  David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Paul.  My view of the emergent church is that the church has been emerging for 2000 years. The next generation is always emerging from the previous one in all walks of life. Our predecessors leave us imperfect ways of dealing with life, we see the errors of emphasizing one thing or another to the detriment of other things they have overlooked, we vow to correct their imbalances, then we leave our own to the next generation. In the process we put labels on what we have been left&#8211;favorable ones (such as &#8220;evangelical&#8221;) if we like it and unfavorable ones (such as &#8220;rational&#8221;) if we don&#8217;t&#8211;and dream up fresh ones for the brilliant solutions we offer (such as &#8220;deep&#8221;). And so goes history, until the Messiah reigns.  David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sacred Companions, by David Benner by Paul Dubuc</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/03/20/sacred-companions-by-david-benner/#comment-4120</link>
		<author>Paul Dubuc</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2010/03/20/sacred-companions-by-david-benner/#comment-4120</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I think the title, "sacred companions" is a general term that covers bother "spiritual friendship" and the spiritual direction relationship.  They're different but they both involve an intentional accompaniment of one person with the other in the pursuit of fellowship with and service to God.  The book covers both types of relationship.  It's interesting that Benner met with some skepticism in suggesting that this type of relationship can exist between a husband and wife.  There are obvious pit-falls there because the two are so close to one another in many other ways, but I think he gives some very good principles for making it work.

By the way, you and Marilyn are among those I thought of in writing that last sentence of my review.  You both have been a tremendous blessing to me and my family.

[Edit:] I was a little slow to grasp your point about my typo in writing this.  Fear not, you finally made it plain to me, and I have corrected it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I think the title, &#8220;sacred companions&#8221; is a general term that covers bother &#8220;spiritual friendship&#8221; and the spiritual direction relationship.  They&#8217;re different but they both involve an intentional accompaniment of one person with the other in the pursuit of fellowship with and service to God.  The book covers both types of relationship.  It&#8217;s interesting that Benner met with some skepticism in suggesting that this type of relationship can exist between a husband and wife.  There are obvious pit-falls there because the two are so close to one another in many other ways, but I think he gives some very good principles for making it work.</p>
<p>By the way, you and Marilyn are among those I thought of in writing that last sentence of my review.  You both have been a tremendous blessing to me and my family.</p>
<p>[Edit:] I was a little slow to grasp your point about my typo in writing this.  Fear not, you finally made it plain to me, and I have corrected it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

