<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Paul M. Dubuc</title>
	<link>http://paul.dubuc.org</link>
	<description>Welcome friends, family and other interested persons!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skeptical Inquirer by Paul Dubuc</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/06/26/skeptical-inquirer/#comment-1167</link>
		<author>Paul Dubuc</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/06/26/skeptical-inquirer/#comment-1167</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lizz,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your thoughts on this.  I think to follow one's heart means more than just listening to feelings and thoughts.  I think it goes deeper than that, on the level with convictions tried by experience.  Neither does it mean that the heart trumps reason.  The point is that reason has inherent limits (so does the heart, of course).  It can only take us so far where knowing God is concerned.  As I see it, it's not a choice between head and heart; we need both.  Each can take us places that the other can't.  Pascal certainly wasn't an irrational believer.  One of my favorite quotes from him is, "We must know where to doubt, where to feel certain, where to submit."  Following one's heart is not an excuse for behaving irrationally.  Neither is rationality an excuse for not following your heart.  They may seem to pull us in different directions sometimes, but truth may be in the synthesis they produce.  This sort of tension governs any relationship we have with another person, why should it be less true of our relationship to God?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suppose it's true that feelings can lead people to very different beliefs but, aside from the point about not abandoning reason, it's also true that reason leads people to very different beliefs. There's no "safe ground" here in reason alone.  That's the point of the article.  Some atheists and skeptics pretend there is because that's what they are most comfortable with.  Head and heart are not really as separate as we like to think, and the way people arrive at very different beliefs has more to do with just the leading of head or heart as if all the possible choices are equally available to the application of either faculty.  Social context plays a big part.  Everyone has to begin somewhere and we are all constrained by our own choices.  Reason can tell you that all religious beliefs can't be true.  It can't tell you that none are true.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lizz,</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts on this.  I think to follow one&#8217;s heart means more than just listening to feelings and thoughts.  I think it goes deeper than that, on the level with convictions tried by experience.  Neither does it mean that the heart trumps reason.  The point is that reason has inherent limits (so does the heart, of course).  It can only take us so far where knowing God is concerned.  As I see it, it&#8217;s not a choice between head and heart; we need both.  Each can take us places that the other can&#8217;t.  Pascal certainly wasn&#8217;t an irrational believer.  One of my favorite quotes from him is, &#8220;We must know where to doubt, where to feel certain, where to submit.&#8221;  Following one&#8217;s heart is not an excuse for behaving irrationally.  Neither is rationality an excuse for not following your heart.  They may seem to pull us in different directions sometimes, but truth may be in the synthesis they produce.  This sort of tension governs any relationship we have with another person, why should it be less true of our relationship to God?</p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s true that feelings can lead people to very different beliefs but, aside from the point about not abandoning reason, it&#8217;s also true that reason leads people to very different beliefs. There&#8217;s no &#8220;safe ground&#8221; here in reason alone.  That&#8217;s the point of the article.  Some atheists and skeptics pretend there is because that&#8217;s what they are most comfortable with.  Head and heart are not really as separate as we like to think, and the way people arrive at very different beliefs has more to do with just the leading of head or heart as if all the possible choices are equally available to the application of either faculty.  Social context plays a big part.  Everyone has to begin somewhere and we are all constrained by our own choices.  Reason can tell you that all religious beliefs can&#8217;t be true.  It can&#8217;t tell you that none are true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skeptical Inquirer by Lizz</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/06/26/skeptical-inquirer/#comment-1166</link>
		<author>Lizz</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/06/26/skeptical-inquirer/#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;"What reason do I have to subordinate the possibility of God’s existence to the powers of my senses?"&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is an interesting question. It leads me to then ask, how else should I determine the existence of God, if not by my senses and by being reasonable? What are my options? It sounds like the article says to 'Follow my Heart'. What does that mean exactly? How does one do that correctly or incorrectly for that matter?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does that mean listen to my thoughts, my feelings, to what I 'feel' God might be telling me? How can I tell if my thoughts and feelings are correct, and really come from God? I can't really.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To believe because you 'feel' like it. How is that Truth? It can't be, because 'following your heart' leads people to different Gods and completely different beliefs. So, is one person right and another wrong? How can you tell? If my heart tells me God wants me to sell everything and leave my husband and children, is that God, how can I tell? Could you argue with me, and tell me I'm making a mistake? No, because according to you my heart trumps reason. So in this case, I'm in the right and no one can tell me different.. especially the skeptics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a real problem with this. Anything goes. ANY belief is correct, as long as you truly feel it is.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What reason do I have to subordinate the possibility of God’s existence to the powers of my senses?&#8221;</p>
<p>That is an interesting question. It leads me to then ask, how else should I determine the existence of God, if not by my senses and by being reasonable? What are my options? It sounds like the article says to &#8216;Follow my Heart&#8217;. What does that mean exactly? How does one do that correctly or incorrectly for that matter?</p>
<p>Does that mean listen to my thoughts, my feelings, to what I &#8216;feel&#8217; God might be telling me? How can I tell if my thoughts and feelings are correct, and really come from God? I can&#8217;t really.</p>
<p>To believe because you &#8216;feel&#8217; like it. How is that Truth? It can&#8217;t be, because &#8216;following your heart&#8217; leads people to different Gods and completely different beliefs. So, is one person right and another wrong? How can you tell? If my heart tells me God wants me to sell everything and leave my husband and children, is that God, how can I tell? Could you argue with me, and tell me I&#8217;m making a mistake? No, because according to you my heart trumps reason. So in this case, I&#8217;m in the right and no one can tell me different.. especially the skeptics.</p>
<p>I have a real problem with this. Anything goes. ANY belief is correct, as long as you truly feel it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skeptical Inquirer by David Henne</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/06/26/skeptical-inquirer/#comment-1124</link>
		<author>David Henne</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/06/26/skeptical-inquirer/#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>As you say, Paul, the article challenges both non-believers and believers. For non-believers, I hadn't thought before of the third option--of creating and hiding. For believers, it is easy to rely only on rational views of God and be unwilling to be vulnerable to something outside the rational "box" that God may want to do in me or through me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you say, Paul, the article challenges both non-believers and believers. For non-believers, I hadn&#8217;t thought before of the third option&#8211;of creating and hiding. For believers, it is easy to rely only on rational views of God and be unwilling to be vulnerable to something outside the rational &#8220;box&#8221; that God may want to do in me or through me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sheila 1992 - 2008 by John</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-898</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 06:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>Sheila was an awesome robust little dog! 
I believe dogs like Sheila are angels here to remind us of our true potential to give and receive unconditional love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheila was an awesome robust little dog!<br />
I believe dogs like Sheila are angels here to remind us of our true potential to give and receive unconditional love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sheila 1992 - 2008 by Phil</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-892</link>
		<author>Phil</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 05:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-892</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to drop a note and say that was a beautifully written remebrance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to drop a note and say that was a beautifully written remebrance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sheila 1992 - 2008 by David Henne</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-891</link>
		<author>David Henne</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-891</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Paul,for sharing your thoughts on Sheila. It was always evident that you enjoyed her as a part of your household. It's intriguing how dogs manifest the interface between the human and animal realms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Paul,for sharing your thoughts on Sheila. It was always evident that you enjoyed her as a part of your household. It&#8217;s intriguing how dogs manifest the interface between the human and animal realms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sheila 1992 - 2008 by Nancy Eberhart</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-887</link>
		<author>Nancy Eberhart</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-887</guid>
		<description>I loved when you said her nose remained good - how we all smiled several years ago when I came to your house for a party and brought a cheesecake.  We put it on a card table - yes, it was pretty close to the edge, but even still a challenge one would think for a pup so small to reach.  BUT, we looked around to see Sheila standing straight and tall on her hind legs with her nose (and tongue) enjoying the cheescake.  We were actually glad she found it - it showed us her nose still had plenty of life!  God bless her and you too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved when you said her nose remained good - how we all smiled several years ago when I came to your house for a party and brought a cheesecake.  We put it on a card table - yes, it was pretty close to the edge, but even still a challenge one would think for a pup so small to reach.  BUT, we looked around to see Sheila standing straight and tall on her hind legs with her nose (and tongue) enjoying the cheescake.  We were actually glad she found it - it showed us her nose still had plenty of life!  God bless her and you too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sheila 1992 - 2008 by Shirley Dubuc</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-885</link>
		<author>Shirley Dubuc</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 01:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-885</guid>
		<description>I remember the greetings we got from Sheila whenever we came for a visit....the excitement in her barking voice let us know how how welcomed we were and how glad she was at seeing us...so full of love and excitement. Also at bed time I remember her willingness to share the futon in the back room with me and how she fluffed up the blankets around me and kept me warm by cuddling up to me. I remember how Shanna and Sheila liked their breakfast of eggs. I would like to think that when we arrive in Heaven, we will see Shanna and Sheila enjoying those eggs together. I truly will be missing you Sheila as I miss Shanna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the greetings we got from Sheila whenever we came for a visit&#8230;.the excitement in her barking voice let us know how how welcomed we were and how glad she was at seeing us&#8230;so full of love and excitement. Also at bed time I remember her willingness to share the futon in the back room with me and how she fluffed up the blankets around me and kept me warm by cuddling up to me. I remember how Shanna and Sheila liked their breakfast of eggs. I would like to think that when we arrive in Heaven, we will see Shanna and Sheila enjoying those eggs together. I truly will be missing you Sheila as I miss Shanna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sheila 1992 - 2008 by MaryBeth Dubuc</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-884</link>
		<author>MaryBeth Dubuc</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 01:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-884</guid>
		<description>Sheila always loved Block Party Day.  Not only did the kids get to play in the street, so did the dogs!  And on just that one day, there were many plates of food left right on the ground, just for her.  My friend Ginny once gave me a coffee mug for my birthday.  It says "Welcome Each New Day."  That was just what Sheila did and encouraged us to do too!  I'll always thank Sheila for that lesson.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheila always loved Block Party Day.  Not only did the kids get to play in the street, so did the dogs!  And on just that one day, there were many plates of food left right on the ground, just for her.  My friend Ginny once gave me a coffee mug for my birthday.  It says &#8220;Welcome Each New Day.&#8221;  That was just what Sheila did and encouraged us to do too!  I&#8217;ll always thank Sheila for that lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sheila 1992 - 2008 by Paul Dubuc</title>
		<link>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-880</link>
		<author>Paul Dubuc</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 17:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paul.dubuc.org/2008/05/17/sheila-1992-2008/#comment-880</guid>
		<description>Yes, she was more fun to dress up than were dolls, wasn't she?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, she was more fun to dress up than were dolls, wasn&#8217;t she?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
